http://fpb.livejournal.com/353925.html?n…
British media, including the supposedly conservative ones, are supporting Obama and (especially) hounding Sarah Palin, with a ferocity unknown even to their American counterparts, and looking more like the Daily Kos than anything…
it does nothing to disprove my view that at the roots of all serious modern political conflict in the West there is abortion; for the British media and establishment, including the so-called conservatives, are completely sold on the practice, and anti-abortion forces are marginalized to an extent unknown and hard to believe in Italy or America…
Sarah Palin, simply by being who she is, is a living rebuke to all the abortion-is-necessary crowd; and this explains the ferocious hatred and the avalanche of pathological lies…
It is not about race; if Judge Clarence Thomas were running for President, he would be treated like Palin has been. It is not even about party; if Condoleeza Rice had run and got the Republican nomination, you can bet your life that she would have had a much smoother ride than Palin. She, after all, has no children. You cannot underrate the power of repressed and concealed guilt feelings, crawling under the skin of all the career women who got rid of unwanted babies in order to please bosses and boyfriends, and indeed among all the men who were complicit in their crimes or even demanded them; when faced with a brilliantly successful career woman who not only had five children, but opted against aborting even the disabled one….
Sarah Palin is a mirror who tells them the truth about themselves; and it is a truth that they cannot bear to see.
Those who are convinced by such things will nod their heads to the above; those who are unconvinced will leave comments saying “this is not a compelling argument; you haven’t proved your point”.
Indeed not.
Cultural observation and criticism, and moral reasoning never results in “proof” in any scientific sense - folks look for patterns, match them against what they know of human nature, and do the best they can in a domain of fuzzy non-mathematical concepts.
The vehement level of support for abortion on the left has always astonished me - folks get agitated for affirmative action, wind power, and other things, but they don’t level viscous personal attacks, mock family members, and criticize the geography, culture, and upbringing of folks over disagreements on smokestack catalytic technology.
That’s reserved for abortion fights.
My take is similar to FDB’s: you’ve got with in the Left a demographic engages in extended adolescences, who hates anyone telling them that they live in the real world, with zero sum rules re: redistribution, health care, etc., and a disdain for personal responsibility. The biggest shining moment in their history of freedom is not the Magna Carta or the American Revolution or defeating the Soviet Union - it’s the sexual revolution of the 1960s. That’s the point in time when man’s most primal urge was given free reign, and - because of changes in society, technology, and law - rendered “without consequence”.
…and then some elements of the right say “Hey, you’re not living in a padded rumpus room - you’re in the real world, and actions have consequences. Your bed hopping is bad for your self image, your health, and your sense of charity - but that’s not the important part. The important part is that by aborting pregnancies you are killing children.”
That’s an unacceptable challenge to one’s self image.
Challenges to one’s self image are never easy to ignore. One is forced to either change, or demonize the challenger (I assert that this is based in low level primate hardwiring - if you’re in a tribe, and a small group of other primates is calling you out, saying that you’re unfit to lead, or even to be a member of the tribe, ignoring them and letting the attitude spread can be deadly).
So the radical pro-choicers fight back, and demonize anyone who - explicitly or implicitly - questions their world view. Thus, I argue, the issue isn’t really “legal access to abortion”, so much as “cultural ability to portray one’s self as a good person”.
I’m hardly even convinced that all of this is conscious - I suspect, actually, that it’s unconscious.
Again, the most vehement attacks are always about sex and abortion.
Read Boing Boing - if it’s still going on now like it was weeks ago, there are maybe two posts saying “McCain stinks”, and about 4,000 saying “Palin is a disgusting subhuman whore with no taste, intelligence, or ability to think for herself. She’s brainwashed and stupid, just like her husband and kids.”
Why the vehemence?
Because Palin - and other pro-lifers - call into question the entire self image of the Boing Boing demographic.
If Palin is worth being respected, then that means that the Boing Boing demographic are not.
You can not simultaneously respect both fecundity and loyalty to one’s own offspring, born and unborn, healthy and impaired, and also respect 30 year old adolescents who think that the two most important freedoms are the freedom to kill a child and the freedom to write Star Trek / Harry Potter slash fanfic.